LP portfolio tracking software for private markets

A 2026 Guide for Individual LPs and Family Offices

If you are a limited partner (LP) in private equity or venture capital funds, you have probably felt the gap. You commit to a dozen funds, capital calls and distributions arrive as PDFs, and there is no single place that shows you what you have called, what you have received, and what is still at work. Spreadsheets do not scale. The platforms built for large institutions are out of reach. And the consumer net worth apps were not designed for fund accounting.

This guide maps the tools that touch this problem, groups them by what they cover and who they are built for, and compares them on the features that matter to an LP. We wrote it because it is genuinely hard to find software that consolidates private-markets fund data for an individual LP or a family office. The goal here is to help you orient, not to talk anyone out of a tool that fits.

A note on method: every entry is based on each company's own public materials. Where a capability was not clearly stated, we wrote "Not specified" rather than guess. Where a product simply does not offer something, we wrote "Not available." We avoid speculation about roadmaps or internals.

Why there is no clean category for this

Search for "investment portfolio management software" and you get hundreds of products, most of them built for public-market portfolios. Add "private equity" or "venture capital" and you quickly land in tools built for GPs (the fund managers) rather than for you, the investor in those funds.

The useful split comes down to two things: what the tool is built around (private markets specifically, or your whole balance sheet) and who it is built for (an individual LP, a family office or advisor, or a large institution). Sort the market on those two axes and it becomes much easier to read.

The first axis matters most when your problem is private-markets fund tracking, so we lead with it:

  • Private-markets-first tools are built around the job you actually have: ingesting capital calls and distributions, consolidating fund commitments, and modelling private-markets cash flows. They run the full buyer range, from affordable tools for individuals and family offices (Clariteer, Vyzer) up through advisor and institutional platforms (Arch, then Chronograph, LP Analyst, Tamarix, Allocator).
  • Cross-asset, total-wealth platforms aggregate your entire balance sheet, with private markets as one module among public markets, cash, real estate and the rest. They span from an affordable individual app (Kubera) to enterprise systems for advisors, family offices and institutions (Addepar, Masttro, Landytech, Qplix).

The comparison

The tables below group the tools by the first axis, private-markets-first versus cross-asset, and within each group they run from the most individual and self-serve at the top to the most institutional at the bottom. Read the "Built for" column first: it tells you whether a tool is meant for you before you look at features.

Legend: Yes = available and clearly stated. Not available = not part of the product. Not specified = the capability may exist but is not clearly stated publicly. Partial = available in a limited form.

Group A: Private-markets-first tools

Built around the job of tracking private-markets fund commitments. The buyer span runs from self-serve individual tools to enterprise institutional platforms.

[Insert table]

Group B: Cross-asset / total-wealth platforms

Aggregate your whole balance sheet, with private markets as one module. Strong if you want one system for every asset class and can buy enterprise software.

[Insert table]

Short profiles

Clariteer. Built specifically for the individual LP, the family office and the multi-family office investing across private-markets funds. You forward your capital call and distribution notices, and Clariteer extracts the detail (20+ fields across three document types today), updates your metrics, and consolidates every fund into one view with a per-fund and aggregated cash model. It computes IRR, MIRR and TVPI, flags inconsistencies, keeps the source document one click away, and lets you bring in your accountant or advisor. Transparent pricing from USD 1,500 per year, with a free trial. Clariteer is in early access today, so a short access call comes before the trial, but the price is published and there is no enterprise sales cycle.

Arch. "The digital admin for private investments." Strong at the operational admin of alternatives: collecting K-1s and statements, automating capital calls, and consolidating documents across managers. By its own account, its customers are mainly family offices, multi-family offices, RIAs, private banks, fund admins and institutional allocators (300+ institutional clients, including several of the largest US banks), with individual investors a small part of the mix rather than the core. Lighter on cash-flow forecasting, named return metrics, and benchmarking. US-centric. Pricing is sales-led and quote-based (an annual subscription scaled to the number of investments you hold) with an onboarding and service component, so it is a guided setup rather than a self-serve sign-up.

Vyzer. A wealth-tracking platform for private investors, with a center of gravity in real-estate syndications and alternatives. Its "Magic Box" extracts data from K-1s, capital calls and investor reports, and it does real cash-flow planning around expected calls and distributions. Transparent, self-serve pricing, though the paid tiers climb quickly.

Kubera. A net-worth tracker for people who manage their own wealth, with credible handling of alternatives (committed capital, capital calls, distributions, IRR, and a Carta integration). Very affordable and transparent (from about USD 250 per year). Best if you want your funds inside a whole-wealth picture rather than deep fund analytics.

Addepar. A global total-wealth data and analytics platform for advisors, RIAs, banks and institutions. Deep alternatives capabilities, including document extraction, scenario modeling and private-fund benchmarks. Enterprise software with AUM-based, quote-only pricing. Powerful, but built for the firm serving you rather than for you directly.

Masttro. Family-office software for UHNW estates, aggregating every asset class, entity and currency, with a dedicated Alternatives AI module for document automation and reconciliation. Quote-only, deliberately not AUM-based. A total-wealth platform rather than a self-serve LP tool.

Landytech (Sesame). A European investment-management platform for family offices, trust companies and banks, with notably explicit private-markets analytics: IRR, DPI, TVPI and RVPI, plus fund-level projections of future calls and distributions. Sold to offices and teams, quote-only.

Qplix. A German-rooted wealth-management platform for family offices, wealth managers and banks, strong on illiquid assets and one of the few to advertise customisable J-curve modeling. Enterprise deployment, often self-hosted, quote-only.

Chronograph. Portfolio-monitoring software used by many of the world's largest LPs and GPs, with deep look-through, document intelligence, forecasting and benchmarking. Institutional scope and pricing.

LP Analyst. A cloud platform for institutional LPs and family offices, anchored by a managed data service that collects and validates fund data for you. Forecasting and benchmarking included. Service-heavy and quote-only.

Allocator. Investment-office software with hedge-fund heritage, aggregating standardized data across public and private funds for family offices and institutions. Strong on peer-group analytics; private capital is one of several focuses. Quote-only.

Tamarix. An "operating system for LP data and workflows" for institutional LPs, family offices and asset owners. Purpose-built for illiquid assets, with strong ingestion, pacing and benchmarking. Institutional buyer profile, quote-only.

Adjacent tools

A few other names come up in searches but belong to different categories, so we grouped them separately rather than compare unlike things:

  • Document-extraction infrastructure (for example Canoe, Alkymi). These turn fund documents into structured data and feed it into other systems (Addepar, accounting platforms, data warehouses). They are excellent at that, but they do not give an LP a consolidated portfolio view, metrics, or forecasting on their own, and they are sold to fund administrators and large allocators.
  • GP and fund-manager tools (for example Visible, Rundit). Built for the other side of the table: VC and PE fund managers (and, for Visible, startup founders) monitoring their portfolio companies and reporting to their own LPs. Their "LP reporting" means a fund reporting down to its LPs, not an LP tracking their own commitments. Rundit, for instance, computes IRR and multiples on a fund's portfolio companies, not on an individual LP's fund positions.

What to look for as an LP

If you are choosing a tool for yourself or your family office, five questions separate a real fit from an expensive overshoot or an underpowered tracker:

  1. Is it built for your side, and your size? A tool made for the largest pensions, or for a fund reporting to its investors, will rarely fit an individual LP. Read the "Built for" column first.
  2. Does it actually read your documents? The work that eats your evenings is retyping capital calls and distribution notices. Look for AI extraction that captures the breakdown, not just headline numbers.
  3. Does it consolidate and forecast? A single view across funds is the baseline. A forward-looking cash model (so you can see future calls and distributions and the J-curve) is what turns tracking into planning.
  4. Does it speak the metrics you care about? IRR is table stakes. MIRR, TVPI and DPI tell you more, and a tool that exposes them clearly saves you a spreadsheet.
  5. Can you actually buy it? Most institutional and family-office platforms are quote-only and priced for firms. Transparent, self-serve pricing matters if you are an individual.

Frequently asked questions

What is LP portfolio tracking software?
Software that lets a limited partner consolidate and monitor their private-markets fund investments in one place: capital calls, distributions, valuations, cash flows and performance metrics, usually by extracting the data from fund documents so you do not have to enter it by hand.

Can an individual investor use Addepar or Chronograph?
Not really on your own. Both are enterprise platforms sold to firms (advisors, banks, and the largest institutions) with quote-only pricing. They are powerful, but they are not designed for an individual LP to sign up and self-serve.

What is the difference between a net-worth tracker and LP software?
A net-worth tracker (such as Kubera) shows your whole balance sheet, with private funds as one slice. Dedicated LP software goes much deeper on the private-markets side: automated ingestion of your capital call and distribution notices, detailed field-level extraction (down to the breakdown you need for tax analysis), and missing-document detection that tells you when a notice has not arrived. It computes fund-level metrics like TVPI, DPI and MIRR and a cash-flow model, and because every figure traces back to the source document, the numbers are auditable in a way a manually updated tracker never is.

Should I use a cross-asset wealth platform or a dedicated private-markets tool?
A simple rule, based on which problem is bigger for you. If the part that actually hurts is the private-markets paperwork (capital calls, distributions, fund-level metrics and cash flow), lean toward a dedicated tool, which tends to go deeper there and cost less. If your harder problem is simply seeing every asset you own in one place, a cross-asset platform earns its keep. The two are not mutually exclusive: most dedicated tools export to Excel and increasingly offer an API or an MCP server, so you can run a focused private-markets tool and still feed its data into a wider wealth view or an AI assistant.

Which tools have transparent, self-serve pricing?
Clariteer publishes transparent pricing (from USD 1,500 per year, currently via early access), and Vyzer and Kubera are fully self-serve. These are the affordable, individual-friendly options here. The family-office and institutional platforms, including Arch, are sales-led and quote-only.

Which tools are built in Europe?
Clariteer, Landytech, Qplix, Allocator and Tamarix have a European base or focus. Addepar and Masttro are global with a US center of gravity; Arch is US-centric; Vyzer and Kubera are global.

Geoffroy De Cooman profile picture
Geoffroy De Cooman
linkedin logo
Co-founder of Clariteer. Individual LP in PE and VC funds. Started building Clariteer because he couldn't get a clear, consolidated view of his own portfolio.
About this guide. Comparisons are based on each vendor's public materials as of June 2026. Capabilities change; where something was unclear we marked it "Not specified" rather than guess, and we welcome corrections from any vendor listed. This page is intended to help LPs and family offices navigate a market that has no clean category, not to rank tools against a single winner.